“忙什么？” 现在一打招呼几乎都是这句。

 

据说咱们中国人以前打招呼都是：“吃了么？” 现在很难听到这句了。仔细想想，过去据说咱们穷，通常吃不饱，所以国人最关心的就是能不能吃上饭。国家政策还写明要解决人民温饱问题。而现在据最新统计数据表明，中国人的肥胖率特别是儿童，已经是高的惊人。现在都开始着急败坏的减肥，所以吃饭，吃没吃饭都已经不是国人所关心的了。也就很少还有人见面问到：“吃了么？”

 

据说咱们中国人现在成天都很忙：忙赚钱的，忙花钱的；忙找律师打官司的，忙和名人搞绯闻的；忙毕业赶紧找工作的，忙着下岗再就业的；写博的忙着发掘社会黑暗表达不满，管事儿的忙着添加过滤词封蔽网站。总之各有各的忙，忙正经的，忙不正经的，反正就是不忙你都与时代脱节，不忙你都耽搁社会主义建设，不忙你都不好意思跟人打招呼~~

 

可是忙来忙去的，有没有是在瞎忙，乱忙，装忙呢？

瞎忙者没忙活自己该忙的：歌星不唱歌忙着拍些忽悠人的虚假广告，导演不拍电影忙着和网民打官司。

乱忙者忙乱了自己所忙的：足协没有他不管的结果楞是真把中国足球忙呼“邪”了，小姑娘忙着记录和男友的激情片段结果也不知怎么就忙活到了网上让广大群众欣赏与学习。

装忙的？哎呀这还真不好形容啊~~反正就是有那么一些人成天给人的感觉就是忙啊忙啊，真忙啊。其实他所忙呼的就是让人以为他很忙。。。是谁~~自己对号入坐吧~~

 

嘿嘿~~看看身边人都很忙的样子，感觉自己是不是有点太清闲了呢？那就赶紧忙吧~~管他忙点什么的，反正忙就是了！！！

 

哎……我忙点什么好呢？

 

 

PS：MSN Spaces已经到了2006-1-16_18.44的版本了   作为一个鼓动MS并喜欢写点心得的不忙的人  经过一个多月的折腾  我将把新MS的一些特性和问题写出来给大家  毕竟我还是被很多人归到教程类空间的

 

2005年即将过去，这一年我收获很大，本想写点来纪念一下。

但是29日发生了一件事，让我不得不延后我的纪念。

 

新京报换了老板，光明的光明日报全面接管。

新京报的同父兄弟--南都的副主编因为签发了广东省副省长被行政记大过的版面遭撤职。

 

 

我本人是看不到新京报的，只是因为结识了陈锋老师，不得不对其所供职的报纸多了些关注。

新京报创立于2003年，是中国两大官方报业集团－－光明日报报业集团和南方日报报业集团合作出版的。其读者群主要是知识分子和新兴白领阶层。南都总编辑程益中曾担任过新京报首任总编辑，他由于"经济问题"被免职并且受到为时五个月的羁押。 被撤职的是去年接任的主编杨斌和副主编孙雪东、李多钰。现在的接管者是来自光明日报。

新京报虽然创办至今才短短两年而已，但以挖掘社会问题、敢于直言的评论而出名。很多事件及其真相都是由该报首家发出的。被认为是中国比较有公信力的报纸之一。

目前尚没有任何出官方的关于杨斌等人撤职的消息及原因和解释。但外电有所披露：援引新闻界知名律师浦志强的话，政府指摘《新京报》"多次犯错误"。

 

我现在写的很压抑，不知道该怎么写，该写点什么。这个消息你在国内的门户网站以及各大报刊上是看不到的。如果你在国外的网站得到了消息，也就是那些所谓的外电。需要澄清一点的是，外电大多说新京报员工百人进行罢工抗议，据陈老师证实，外边报道有所失实。他们大多都很平静，因为都一样的比较压抑，所以没心情工作，顶多算是怠工，还远够不上罢工。

安替在BLOG上为新京报嚎叫了几嗓子， 结果今天该同学的BLOG就上不去了。

 

我在这里写了半年了，除去那些教程类的，我写过的还蛮多的：旅游经历，吃喝体会，玩乐经验，正经的和不正经的，扯淡瞎掰的。我还真就没写过政治的，因为专业不对口所以也搞不明白。甚至也与我无关，谁黑谁白，谁对谁错，都不妨碍我吃喝玩乐。所以我仅仅写点些许文字表示我这个局外人对该事件的“关注”。多了我真的不敢写了，我是老实人家的孩子，胆子小，生怕把我的空间给封了那可就划不来了。

我记我小时候很喜欢看报纸，长大了却没了这个习惯了。

 

纪念即将离去的2005，纪念已经离去的他们。

 

 

6号，我们两个同胞死了．

死的很残，

一个被爆头，一个被射了10弹．

杀害他们的是越南帮，

同样的，他们也是被自己杀害的．

 

他们在Fullhouse的存酒还没有喝完

太郎的野马跑车也才开了正好两个整月

BOB的C230也才刚刚打过蜡

这两辆魁北克牌照的车上的国旗还依旧飘扬

只是主人的20年光阴走完的有些匆忙

 

中国人说逝者为大  多了我也不想说了

希望他们在那边过的好！

 

PS:当天得知了这个消息, 感觉不是很好,毕竟死了同胞. 当天本来想写点东西,想来想去到了今天才写了些.也不说什么了,只是告诉那些兄弟们, 好好过自己的日子,想清楚自己出来是干什么的. 老爸老妈花钱供你, 不是让你在江湖上立名扬威的.

想要悼念他们的朋友可以到他俩的空间:

 

Whether there’s afterlife, the answer has never been the same. The atheists deny after life, believing that our life is no more than from the cradle to the grave. They may care about their illustrious names after death; they may feel attached to the affection of their offspring, but they never lay their hopes on their afterlife. They may also say that good will be rewarded with good, and evil with evil, but they don’t really believe any retribution in their after life.

However, in the religious world or among the superstitious people, the belief in afterlife is very popular. They do not only believe in afterlife, but thousands of reincarnations as well. In the  mysterious world, there are the paradise and the hell, the celestial beings and the gods, the Buddha and the Bodhisattvas.

Maybe they really believed it, or maybe they just wanted to make use of people’s veneration, the ancient emperors always declared that they were the real dragons, the sons of God, while the royal ministers claimed to be the reincarnations of various constellations. But can the stars reincarnate?

Many people burn incense and kowtow, do good deeds and strive for virtues, not just for the present, but mainly to let God see their sincerity so as to be reborn into a better afterlife, or to achieve the highest enlightenment after several lives of practice. They do believe in afterlife. But I can’t help asking: Suppose there were no afterlife, would you still do good deeds and strive for virtues? And If God does not see what you are doing, would you still be so upright and selfless? If you work, not for serving the public and liberating the others, but just for a better afterlife of your own, isn’t it a little too selfish? Comparing with this kind of believers, those who don’t believe in afterlife, but still keep doing good deeds, are the most sincere and honest philanthropists, because they do them not for themselves but for other.

You may wonder if I believe in afterlife. My answer is: I know nothing about my previous life, so I dare not make improper comments on afterlife. But I do hope there's afterlife! Because our present life is so short that so many things slip away before our proper understanding. I have so many dreams, so many wishes, so many ambitions, as well as so many regrets and concerns. If there were no afterlife, all of them will remain unrealized!

I'm not contented with the present commonplace life,I'm very much attached to the affections that should have been mine but have been washed away by the hurrying time, and I yearn for the perfection and maturity if I could start all over again. So believe it or not, I'd rather there were afterlife.

刚才写了篇文字 尚且不能为章 呵呵

是讲了些关于男女对感情之事的看法

由于所涉及之文字 在MSN上有所禁忌

所以还请各位看官到在下之另个BLOG去瞅瞅

欢迎大家对于祺祺之拙见提出意见

要是俩BLOG都留下贵言的话  就太欢迎了

呵呵`````

文是:http://hello77.blogdriver.com/hello77/940942.html

当然也可以看看 其他的文字:http://hello77.blogdriver.com

 

Today Andy Xie said in his blog that China's slowdown has begun, and its cause is overcapacity. The leading indicators for investment
profit margins, commodity prices and property prices, are turning down.
Corporate cash flow is shrinking, which is forcing a reduction in investment.

blame whom? no one.

just see and wait.

A British restaurant emerged as the best in the world in an annual list that also revealed Britain — a country often laughed at for its poor food — is home to the largest number of top eateries while Asia boasts just one. The Fat Duck, in a village in Berkshire, west of London, won the coveted title of top dining spot at The World’s 50 Best Restaurant of 2005 awards last week, which also featured 13 other restaurants in Britain alone.

Critics, however, argued that the annual list — compiled by the magazine Restaurant and chosen by more than 500 chefs and experts — was more of a guide on good places to eat rather than the best the world has to offer.

Comprising entries from mainly developed countries, France had eight restaurants inside the top 50, while the United States only had six.

Asia was notably lacking in representation at the awards in London, with just one restaurant in Hong Kong, called Felix, coming in at No. 49.

Owned by chef Heston Blumenthal, The Fat Duck wowed the judges with original dishes such as sardine on toast sorbet and bacon and egg ice cream.

“It’s a complete package of enjoyment I am after,” said Blumenthal, whose scientific approach to creating new flavors has seen him dubbed the guru of “molecular gastronomy,” according to The Guardian newspaper.

“If I discover something new and get a sense of excitement about it, I want to pass it on to the customer in the dining room,” he was quoted as saying by the daily.

“It is like when you see an incredible view or drink a great bottle of wine — the experience is heightened if you share it with someone else.”

The restaurant, which offers three extensive menus ranging in price from 37.50 pounds for lunch to 97.50 pounds, snatched the top slot from The French Laundry in California, pushing it into third place.

Second in line was Spain’s El Bulli, while fourth and fifth went to Tetsuya’s in Sydney and Gordon Ramsay in London.

Ella Johnston, the editor of Restaurant magazine, said the public’s growing enthusiasm for food drove Britain’s dynamic restaurant scene — which has moved far away from the stereotypical, bland image of meat-and-two-veg in the past.

“British chefs used to just go abroad to the United States and France,” she was quoted as saying in The Guardian.

“Now, with people becoming more adventurous eaters and with more money in London and the surrounding areas, they know they will have an audience for great food,” she said.

Jay Rayner, a food critic in the weekly Observer newspaper, however, argued that the list was an unfair reflection of the world’s dining industry.

“By no stretch of the imagination are 14 of the world’s best restaurants in the U.K.,” he said in The Guardian newspaper.

While agreeing that The Fat Duck deserved its No.1 rating and other eateries were tasty, Rayner said: “The list is a collection of 50 good restaurants, some of which deserve to be there, some of which don’t.

Johnston agreed that the list could be seen as “Anglocentric,” but she denied that it was biased as it had been chosen by an international panel.